Send charcoal for carbon dating
So rock samples that should read zero are occasionally placed into the instruments to test their accuracy.What better samples to use than fossils, coals, and limestones, which are supposed to be millions of years old and should have no radiocarbon?So if fossils are really millions of years old, as evolutionary scientists claim, no carbon-14 atoms would be left in them.
But these scientists’ presuppositions prevent them from reaching this conclusion. Andrew Snelling Figure 3 Sample from Marlstone Rock Bed, a muddy limestone in one wall of the Hornton Quarries at Edge Hill, west of Banbury in England.
If the radioactive element carbon-14 breaks down quickly—within a few thousand years—why do we still find it in fossils and diamonds?
It’s a dilemma for evolutionists, who believe the rocks are millions of years old. Radiocarbon (carbon-14) is a very unstable element that quickly changes into nitrogen.
This is not such a problem for creationist scientists, but it is a serious problem for evolutionists.
Evolutionary radiocarbon scientists have still not conceded that fossils, coals, and diamonds are only thousands of years old.