Dating of dinosaurs bones Chat with chennai girls without registration
Here are some clues for why the report was censored (unfortunately no pterosaur fossils were tested, only dinosaurs): Carbon-14 Dating Results for Dinosaurs (BP=before present) #2 (Montana, two samples): 30,110 to 39,230 years BP .
Typical error potential listed for the above C-14 testing is only a few centuries but sometimes even less than one century.
The CRSQ study authors tested seven dinosaur bones, including a from Montana, hadrosaurids, a cartilaginous paddlefish, a bony fish, and fresh-looking wood and lizard bones from Permian layers in Canada and Oklahoma.
Five different commercial and academic laboratories detected carbon-14 in all the samples, whether from Cenozoic, Mesozoic, or Paleozoic source rocks. The team also compared the results to several dozen published carbon-14 results for fossils, wood, and coal from all over the world and throughout the geologic column.
I would think that a creature of such threat to life and sheer size would be mentioned, at least in passing.
Perhaps I am not familiar with the passage that clearly describes man walking amongst dinosaurs.
This has been argued before, but the testing process itself is loaded with procedures that rigorously remove contaminants.
Radiocarbon dating of dinosaur fossils has generally not been done until recent years, for the great majority of scientists had assumed such testing would be pointless.
Because radiocarbon decays relatively quickly, fossils that are even 100,000 years old should have virtually characters repeatedly mention "million years ago" in the context of their dinosaurs.
In the movie, fictional scientists essentially resurrect and genetically redesign dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and even a giant mosasaur—creatures supposedly extinct for 65-75 million years.
Carbon-14 dating was recently performed on dinosaur fossils,1 and the results were presented at the Western Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 2012, a gathering of approximately two thousand scientists.
Jean De Pontcharra, a Phd in Physics, has a presentation for creationist conferences entitled “Is Radiocarbon dating reliable? On a charitable interpretation, the best we can say about this story is that ID has always been plagued by gross incompetence.